Details
| Description | California published appellate decision holding that (1) All class members, not just the named plaintiff, must have been "injured in business and property" by the deception; (2) The "likelihood to deceive" standard no longer exists, because "by reason of" means that actual reliance on any deception must be proven; and that (3) Each class member must prove such actual reliance. The court itself acknowledges that its decision would decimate private UCL litigation, but decides that Prop. 64's language compels that result. |
| Ownership | scott |
| Views | 621 views. Averaging 0 views per day. |
| Similar Listings | |
| Submission Date | 11/07/06 |
scott's Membership Status
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 78 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 21/07/21 - 07:38:53
Biographical Information
Homepage: http://www.mcmillanlaw.us
Occupation: Lawyer
Birthdate: December 8, 1963 (60 years old)
Contact Information
Submission History
Find all listings submitted by scott
