Fear Not Law Articles: ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS,v. PESTICIDE REGULATION

xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

Filed 3/17/06

ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS,v. PESTICIDE REGULATION

Filed 3/17/06

CERTIFIED
FOR PUBLICATION>>

COPY

IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE
DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES
TO TOXICS,

????????? Plaintiff and Appellant,

???? v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
PESTICIDE REGULATION et al.,

????????? Defendants and Respondents;

DOW AGROSCIENCES et al.,

????????? Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

C046813

(Super.
Ct. No. 02CS01850)

ORDER
MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO
CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion
filed herein on February 15, 2006, and modified
on February 16, 2006, be further modified as follows:

On page 35, fourth sentence of
the first paragraph, the words ? href="http://www.sandiegohealthdirectory.com/">as precipitously? are
inserted between the words ?declining? and
?despite? so that the sentence reads as follows:

This, Alternatives
argues, explains why tree frogs are not declining as precipitously despite
pesticide drift.

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellant?s petition for href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">rehearing is denied.>>

href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/"> >>

BY THE COURT:

style="mso-spacerun: yes">????????? DAVIS????????? , Acting P.J.

style="mso-spacerun: yes">????????? NICHOLSON????? , J.

style="mso-spacerun: yes">????????? RAYE?????????? , J.

Publication Courtesy of href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">California attorney directory. style='mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman"'>>>

Analysis and review provided by href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Oceanside Apartment Manager Lawyers.

Description	A decision as to modification of judgment.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.