A/R Capital v. Santa Monica Properties
Filed 10/11/06 A/R Capital v. Santa Monica Properties CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
| A/R CAPITAL LLC , Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA MONICA PROPERTIES, Defendant and Respondent, | B186674 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC 227887) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 18, 2006, be modified as follows:
1. On page 1, counsel listing, third sentence, delete the words “and Cecil McNab.”
2. On page 2, line 1, change the word “Appellants” to “Appellant”, delete the words “Cecil McNab (McNab) and” and change the word “appeal” to “appeals” so that the sentence reads: “Appellant A/R Capital LLC (A/R Capital) appeals the trial court’s grant of Santa Monica Properties’ (SMP) motion for nunc pro tunc correction . . . .”
3. On page 6, first line after the caption “DISCUSSION”, delete the words “McNab and” and change the word “make” to “makes” so that the sentence reads: “A/R Capital makes numerous arguments on appeal, . . .”
4. On page 6, footnote 6, line 1, delete the words “and McNab” and change the word “have” to “has, so that the sentence reads “In connection with this appeal, A/R Capital has requested we take judicial notice. . . .”
Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.
________________________________________________________________________
PERLUSS, P. J. WOODS, J ZELON, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line Lawyers.
