legal news


Register | Forgot Password

AUGUST ENTERTAINMENT, INC v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY PART II

AUGUST ENTERTAINMENT, INC v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY PART II
01:30:2007

AUGUST ENTERTAINMENT, INC v


AUGUST ENTERTAINMENT, INC v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY


 


Filed 1/8/07


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION ONE







AUGUST ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,


            Plaintiff and Appellant,


            v.


PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,


            Defendant and Respondent.



      B184276


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. BC322754)



STORY CONTINUED FROM PART I……


 


A similar analysis applies in this case.  If we accept August Entertainment's line of reasoning, D& O insurers could be held liable for corporate debts based on the way in which an officer signs a contract on behalf of the corporation, for example, by failing to include â€





Description Directors and officers liability policy does not cover a breach of contract claim where an officer entered into a contract without stating that he was acting on behalf of the corporation. Where payment of the underlying debt is not insured by the policy, failure to pay it is not a wrongful act to which coverage applies.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale