legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Barbush Rentals v. Daewoo of Los Angeles

Barbush Rentals v. Daewoo of Los Angeles
06:14:2006

Barbush Rentals v


Barbush Rentals v. Daewoo of Los Angeles


Filed 5/19/06  Barbush Rentals v. Daewoo of Los Angeles CA2/8


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


 


 


 


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION EIGHT







BARBUSH RENTALS, INC.,


            Plaintiff and Appellant,


            v.


DAEWOO OF LOS ANGELES,


            Defendant and Respondent.



      B175950


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. BC 283125)



            APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles.  Paul Gutman, Judge.  Affirmed.


            Law Offices of Kelly S. Johnson and Kelly S. Johnson for Plaintiff and Appellant.


            Molino & Associates and Steven R. Berardino for Defendant and Respondent.


____________________________


SUMMARY


A car rental agency and a car dealer executed purchase orders for a fleet of 75 vehicles.  The purchase orders included terms under which the cars would be repurchased, and identified the manufacturer as the â€





Description A decision regarding buyback guarantor. A car rental agency and a car dealer executed purchase orders for a fleet of 75 vehicles.The terms for the repurchase are set by the manufacturer.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale