legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ Part IV

BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ Part IV
07:05:2006

BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ





Filed 6/29/06





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA





BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. et al., )


)


Plaintiffs and Appellants, )


) S123659


v. )


) Ct. App. 6 H023778


COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., )


) Santa Cruz County Super. Ct.


Defendants and Appellants. ) Nos. CV134816 & CV137992


_______________________________________ )


Story continue from Part III …….


Putting these deficits aside, and leaving for another day the question of whether it is appropriate to employ a clear indication rule in disputes involving state preemption of local regulations, there are several problems with the majority's application of this approach here. The majority concludes that the Legislature did not clearly indicate its preemptive intent with regard to zoning because section 4516.5, subdivision (d) does not refer to zoning or other locational restrictions expressly or â€





Description County's zoning ordinances restricting timber harvesting to specified zone districts and limiting the parcels on which helicopter operations associated with such harvesting can occur are not preempted by state forestry acts.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale