legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Bolia-Schutt v. Cedar Fair

Bolia-Schutt v. Cedar Fair
03:31:2006

Bolia-Schutt v. Cedar Fair



Filed 3/24/06 Bolia-Schutt v. Cedar Fair CA4/3




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA






FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION THREE













GESTEMANI BOLIA-SCHUTT, as Administrator, etc., et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


CEDAR FAIR, L.P. et al.,


Defendants and Respondents.



G033685


(Super. Ct. No. 02CC13037)


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR


REHEARING; DENYING REQUESTS


FOR PUBLICATION; AND


MODIFYING OPINION; NO


CHANGE IN JUDGMENT



Plaintiffs' petition for rehearing is DENIED.


Defendants and various nonparty amusement park operators have requested that the opinion filed February 22, 2006, be certified for publication. The opinion does not meet the standards set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 976(c). The request is DENIED.


Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 978, the clerk of this court is directed to forward a copy of our opinion, this order, and the requests for publication to the Supreme Court.


The opinion filed February 22, 2006, is ordered MODIFIED as follows:


1. On page 16, delete the first three sentences of the first new paragraph, beginning with, â€





Description A decision regarding modification of decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale