legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BOWMAN v. WYATT Part-I

BOWMAN v. WYATT Part-I
08:24:2010



BOWMAN v




BOWMAN v. WYATT

















Filed 7/1/10













CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION











IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FOUR










>






BARRY A. BOWMAN,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



TOMMIE WYATT, JR.,
et al.,



Defendants and Appellants.




B207468



(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC329390)












APPEAL
from a judgment of the Superior
Court of Los Angeles
County, Holly E. Kendig, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Law
Office of Stephen S. Talt and Stephen S. Talt for
Defendant and Appellant Tommie Wyatt, Jr.

John
P. DeGomez, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Feris M. Greenberger,
Carolyn Oill, and Sheila A. Wirkus for Defendant and Appellant City of Los
Angeles.

Robert
S. Gerstein, Tourtelot & Butler and Robert H. Tourtelot, and T. Sean Butler
for Plaintiff and Respondent.




>INTRODUCTION



Plaintiff
Barry A. Bowman (plaintiff or Bowman) brought the present action after
suffering devastating
injuries when his motorcycle collided with a dump truck owned and operated
by defendant Tommie Wyatt, Jr. (Wyatt).
The collision occurred shortly after Wyatt delivered a load of asphalt
to a work site of defendant City of Los Angeles (City), with whom Wyatt was under
contract.

The jury found that Wyatt caused the
accident by negligently making a left turn in front of Bowman's
motorcycle. The jury further found that
Wyatt was a City employee, that the City breached a duty to inspect and
maintain the dump truck's brakes, that the truck was controlled by the City and
was in a dangerous condition, and that the work in which Wyatt was engaged at
the time of the accident involved a special risk of harm. It returned a verdict for Bowman of over
$15 million.

The City has appealed, contending
that: (1) the jury was misinstructed on
several critical issues, including the factors it was to consider in
determining if Wyatt was an employee or independent contractor; (2) there was
no substantial evidence to support a finding that defects in the dump truck's
brakes were a proximate cause of the accident; (3) as a matter of law, the work
in which Wyatt was engaged did not involve a peculiar risk of harm; and
(4) the trial court erred in deciding as a matter of law that the City was
the dump truck's â€




Description Plaintiff Barry A. Bowman (plaintiff or Bowman) brought the present action after suffering devastating injuries when his motorcycle collided with a dump truck owned and operated by defendant Tommie Wyatt, Jr. (Wyatt). The collision occurred shortly after Wyatt delivered a load of asphalt to a work site of defendant City of Los Angeles (City), with whom Wyatt was under contract.
The jury found that Wyatt caused the accident by negligently making a left turn in front of Bowman's motorcycle. The jury further found that Wyatt was a City employee, that the City breached a duty to inspect and maintain the dump truck's brakes, that the truck was controlled by the City and was in a dangerous condition, and that the work in which Wyatt was engaged at the time of the accident involved a special risk of harm. It returned a verdict for Bowman of over $15 million.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale