By a first amended complaint, 39 residents of the Sonora Estates Mobilehome Park (the Park) sued Sonora Estates and six other defendants for damages based on defendants’ alleged failure to maintain the Park’s common areas, facilities and physical improvements in good working order, and for reducing services.
Boyd v. Sonora Estates, LLC CA3
mk's Membership Status
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09
Biographical Information
Contact Information
Submission History
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3
Find all listings submitted by mk
By mk
11:30:2018
| Description | Defendant Sonora Estates, LLC, appeals from denial of its motion to compel arbitration. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (a).) The trial court gave several independent reasons to deny the motion to compel, one of which was that Sonora Estates had failed to carry its burden to show the existence of valid arbitration agreements. On appeal, Sonora Estates fails to challenge this dispositive finding. Accordingly, we affirm without addressing Sonora Estates’ remaining contentions. |
| Rating | |
| Views | 28 views. Averaging 28 views per day. |
