legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BRASSFIELD v. MORELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT

BRASSFIELD v. MORELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
07:12:2006

BRASSFIELD v. MORELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT




Filed 7/6/06


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


MICHAEL BRASSFIELD, H028855


Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Clara County


Superior Court


v. No. 1-03-CV-817409)


MORELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT,


Defendant and Respondent.


_____________________________________/


Plaintiff Michael Brassfield appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Moreland School District (Moreland). He claims that reversal is required because an alternate juror (the alternate) was present in the jury room for 15 minutes at the beginning of the jury's deliberations before her presence was discovered and she was removed. We conclude that the error was not reversible per se and that the presumption of prejudice was rebutted. Consequently, we find the error harmless and affirm the judgment.


I. Background


Brassfield sued Moreland for breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation, and the action was tried to a jury. After the trial jurors had been instructed and had gone into the jury room to deliberate, the court clerk and the bailiff discovered that the alternate was in the jury room with the trial jurors. The bailiff removed the alternate from the jury room after about 15 minutes of deliberations.


The trial jurors were returned to the courtroom, and the trial judge instructed them to â€





Description A tale of an alternate juror's presence in a jury room for 15 minutes at beginning of the deliberations.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale