legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BROWN v. RHINO

BROWN v. RHINO
03:27:2006


BROWN v. RHINO












Filed 2/21/06; pub. & mod. order 3/23/06 (see end of opn.)





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT






DIVISION THREE










A.F. BROWN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


RHINO ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., et al.,


Defendants and Appellants.



G035694


(Super. Ct. No. 04CC09607)


O P I N I O N



Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Eleanor M. Palk, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.


Hollins • Schechter and Kenneth C. Jones for Defendants and Appellants.


Law Office of Amanda J. Potier, Amanda J. Potier and Karen L. Van Zee for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Defendants Rhino Electric Supply, Inc., and Tom Bentele appeal the trial court's denial of their special motion to strike brought under the anti-SLAPP statute[1] (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16).[2] Defendants contend their filing of a stop notice and other debt collection efforts constituted acts â€





Description A decision regarding special motion to strike brought under the anti-SLAPP statute
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale