legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Cameron v. Firstar Bank

Cameron v. Firstar Bank
02:16:2006

Cameron v. Firstar Bank




Filed 2/15/06 Cameron v. Firstar Bank CA2/8




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION EIGHT












ANGELA CAMERON et al.,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


FIRSTAR BANK,


Defendant and Respondent.



B178813


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BC191733)



APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.


Susan Bryant-Deason, Judge. Reversed and remanded.


Angela Cameron, in pro. per., and Winnie Doeman, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


McCarthy & Holthus, Thomas J. Holthus, Daniel J. Goulding and Matthew E. Podmenik for Defendants and Respondents.


This is the second appeal by Angela Cameron and Winnie Doeman (appellants) in connection with the foreclosure of their house by Firstar Bank (respondent). In the prior appeal, we affirmed in part and reversed in part. We found a Notice of Default, upon which a foreclosure sale was based, to be invalid. In all other respects, we affirmed the judgment. In a footnote we stated, â€





Description A civil law decision on foreclouser of house by Bank.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale