legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Carey v. Carey

Carey v. Carey
11:01:2006

Carey v. Carey


Filed 10/24/06 Carey v. Carey CA2/1







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE










BRIAN CAREY,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


RAYMOND CAREY,


Defendant and Respondent.



B188564


x-ref. B184141


(Super. Ct. No. SC 083600)


(John L. Segal, Judge)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION


[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]



THE COURT:*


IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on September 28, 2006, be modified in the following particulars:


On page 1, at counsel listing for plaintiff and appellant, add the words “and Roger Jon Diamond” after “in pro. per.,” so that it now reads:


Brian Carey, in pro. per., and Roger Jon Diamond for Plaintiff and Appellant.


This modification does not have an effect on the judgment.


____________________________________________________________________


*


VOGEL, Acting P.J. ROTHSCHILD, J. JACKSON, J.**


** (Judge of the L. A. Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.)


Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.


Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line Lawyers.





Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale