legal news


Register | Forgot Password

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY v. CHARLES A. POLISSO part I

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY v. CHARLES A. POLISSO part I
06:14:2006

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY v


CENTURY SURETY COMPANY v. CHARLES A. POLISSO


Filed 5/22/06


 


 


 


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


 


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Sacramento)







CENTURY SURETY COMPANY,


     Plaintiff, Cross-defendant


     and Appellant,


     v.


CHARLES A. POLISSO et al.,


     Defendants, Cross-complainants


     and Respondents.



C045334


(Super. Ct. No. 98ASO1461)



     APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Lloyd A. Phillips, Jr., Judge.  Affirmed.


     Chapman, Popik & White, Susan M. Popik, David Nied, Merri A. Baldwin; Bonetati, Sasaki, Kincaid & Kincaid, Marilyn L. Bonetati, for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.


     Bolling, Walter & Gawthrop, Theodore D. Bolling, Jr., Marjorie E. Manning; Farmer, Murphy, Smith & Alliston, George E. Murphy and Suzanne M. Nicholson, for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.


     Century Surety Company (Century), an insurance company, appeals from the judgment after a jury awarded Charles and Therese Polisso (the Polissos) and Kinzel Glass Company (Kinzel) $637,911 in total compensatory damages and $2,015,000 in punitive damages on their cross-complaint for, inter alia, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and malicious prosecution. 


     In 1996 Chuck Polisso, as â€





Description A decision regarding breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and malicious prosecution.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale