Filed
9/9/10
>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
AMZ INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant, Cross‑defendant and
Respondent;
PACIFIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY et al.,
Defendants, Cross‑complainants
and Appellants.
G041188
(Super. Ct. No. 06CC08942)
O P I N I O N
Appeal from a judgment
and postjudgment orders of the Superior
Court of Orange
County, Kirk H. Nakamura, Judge. Affirmed.
Wesierski & Zurek,
Thomas W. Ely, Laura J. Barns and John E. Stobart for Defendants, Cross‑complainants
and Appellants.
Gilbert, Kelly, Crowley
& Jennett, Timothy Kenna, Craig H. Bell and Allan E. Perry for
Plaintiff and Respondent.
No appearance for
Defendant, Cross‑defendant and Respondent.
Introduction
A
binder is a contract of insurance that provides coverage pending the issuance
of the insurance policy. ( >Adams v. Explorer Ins. Co. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 438, 451 ( >Adams).) The central issue in this case is whether a
document entitled â€
Description | A binder is a contract of insurance that provides coverage pending the issuance of the insurance policy. (Adams v. Explorer Ins. Co. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 438, 451 (Adams).) The central issue in this case is whether a document entitled †|
Rating |