CITY OF ARCATA v. VIACOM OUTDOOR, INC
Filed 6/8/06
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| VIACOM OUTDOOR, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF ARCATA et al., Defendants and Appellants. | A110628 (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. DR020089) |
The trial court determined that state law preempted the efforts by the City of Arcata (City) to enforce its ordinances requiring permits before Viacom Outdoor, Inc. (Viacom) could rebuild a number of wind-destroyed billboards. Because it had no authority to insist on compliance with its ordinances, the City was also found to have violated Viacom's federal civil rights. Damages and attorney fees were awarded to Viacom under federal civil rights statutes.
The primary issue presented on this appeal by the City is whether California's Outdoor Advertising Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 5200 et seq (the State Act)[1]) preempts municipal ordinances that require a permit for rebuilding outdoor stand-alone billboards destroyed by natural forces. We conclude this well‑established local power is not displaced by the State Act. We further conclude that because the municipal ordinances are valid and enforceable, their threatened enforcement has not yet been shown to have caused actionable damage. In light of these conclusions, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
The salient facts are easily recounted. Viacom owned four billboards located within the City and adjacent to State Highway 101. For each of the billboards Viacom had a current â€
