City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical Systems
Filed 2/3/0 City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical Systems CA2/2




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977






IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA






SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT







DIVISION TWO





CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.
B169596

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC214551)


APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

Alan Buckner, Judge. Affirmed.

Maher & Maher, Michael K. Maher for Defendants and Appellants.

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Carl K. Newton, City Attorney, Brian A. Pierik, Alan A. Sozio for Plaintiff and Respondent.

___________________________________________________

NTS Technical Systems, Inc. (NTS), and ETCR, Inc. (ETCR) (collectively, appellants),[1] appeal from the judgment entered in an eminent domain action by the City of Santa Clarita (City). They contend the judgment must be reversed, because the trial court erred in finding they failed to show any qualifying goodwill loss; in excluding expert valuation testimony; and in computing the value of the â€