DANIEL V., v. SUPERIOR COURT
Filed 5/2/06 APPENDIX NOT AVAILABLE ELECTRONICALLY
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin)
| DANIEL V., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. |
C050566
(Super. Ct. No. J062346) |
| JAMIE K., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. |
C051071
(Super. Ct. No. J056768)
|
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS. Writ of Mandate/Prohibition. Granted. Superior Court of San Joaquin County, Barbara A. Kronlund, J.
James Larsen, Public Defender, Edmund B. Shaver and Nelson C. Lu, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner in No. C050566.
James Larsen, Public Defender, Vickie L. Delph and Nelson C. Lu, Deputy Public Defenders for Petitioner in No. C051071.
No appearance for Respondent.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson and Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorneys General, Carlos A. Martinez, George M. Hendrickson and Stephen G. Herndon, Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest.
Story continued from Part I……….
In their preliminary opposition to the writ petition, the People suggested that, because contested issues could have been adjudicated at the first jurisdictional hearing, any section 170.6 challenge should have been made before the first jurisdictional hearing (even though the first such hearing for each minor turned out to have a visiting judge). We disagree. For purposes of applying section 170.6 in juvenile court proceedings, â€
