Danzas AEI Internat. v.
Container Connection
Filed
CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
ONE
DANZAS AEI INTERCONTINENTAL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CONTAINER CONNECTION OF Defendant and Appellant. | B172120 ( Super. |
APPEAL from
a judgment of the Superior Court of Los
Angeles County, James L. Wright, Judge.
Reversed in part; affirmed in part.
Wyatt Law
Offices and Marva Jo Wyatt for Defendant and Appellant.
Flynn,
Delich & Wise, Jeanine Steele Tede and Alex H. Cherin for Plaintiffs and
Respondents.
____________________
INTRODUCTION
Defendant
Container Connection of Southern California (CCSC) appeals from the judgment
entered in favor of plaintiffs Danzas AEI Intercontinental (Danzas) and Danmar
Lines, Ltd. (Danmar) (collectively referred to as plaintiffs). We reverse the judgment to the extent it is
adverse to CCSC.
FACTS
Danzas is
in the business of facilitating transportation services. Danzas acts as an agent for its sister
company, Danmar, a non-vessel owning common carrier.[1] Danzas' duties include settling claims
against Danmar.
In the fall
of 2000, Danzas and Danmar formed a business relationship with Sensory Science
(Sensory). Danzas, as agent for Danmar,
arranged for the transportation and distribution of consumer electronic
equipment belonging to Sensory from
to the
â€
| Description | Defendant Container Connection of Southern California (CCSC) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs Danzas AEI Intercontinental (Danzas) and Danmar Lines, Ltd. (Danmar) (collectively referred to as plaintiffs). Court reverse the judgment to the extent it is adverse to CCSC. |
| Rating |
