Davis v. Bosch Tool
Filed 3/28/07 Davis v. Bosch Tool CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
KENNETH DAVIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT BOSCH TOOL CORP. et al., Defendants and Appellants, | B188710 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC310229) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Victor E. Chavez, Judge. Dismissed.
Connelly Sheehan Harris LLP, Rachel B. Cowen, Ellen DeVoe Stuart, Kris Thompson, and Michael Sheehan, pro hac vice; Swerdlow Florence Sanchez Swerdlow & Wimmer, David A. Wimmer, and Janet Swerdlow for Defendants and Appellants.
Nikki Tolt; Jeffrey A. Brightwell; Benedon & Serlin, Gerald M. Serlin and Douglas G. Benedon for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_______________
The Robert Bosch Tool Corporation and the Robert Bosch Corporation challenge the inclusion of the Robert Bosch Tool Corporation in the judgment obtained by respondent Ralph Davis, on his complaint. We resolved that issue in appellants' other appeal of the judgment, in Case No. B185408. For that reason, this appeal is dismissed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
ARMSTRONG, Acting P. J.
We concur:
MOSK, J.
KRIEGLER, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.
