Djordjevic v. Ring
Filed 6/8/06 Djordjevic v. Ring CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| ALEXANDER DJORDJEVIC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TERRY RING, JR., et al., Defendants and Respondents. | A112869 (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. C03-01172) |
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant Alexander Djordjevic filed a notice of appeal from a judgment entered against him in this civil action. Respondents Terry Ring, Jr. and Broadway Investors (collectively Ring) have moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely. We grant this motion because Djordjevic failed to file a timely notice of appeal.
II. DISCUSSION
On October 21, 2005, the Honorable Steven K. Austin filed a judgment granting Ring's motion for summary judgment. Ring served a notice of entry of the October 21, 2005, judgment on Djordjevic on October 21, 2005.[1] Djordjevic filed a notice of appeal on January 5, 2006.
Rule 2(a) of the California Rules of Court (rule 2(a)) states: â€
