legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Dye v. Sup. Ct.

Dye v. Sup. Ct.
07:21:2006

Dye v. Sup. Ct.






Filed 7/19/06 Dye v. Sup. Ct. CA1/2






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.






IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO










RICHARD B. DYE, M.D.,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY,


Respondent.


___________________________________


MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA,


Real Party in Interest



A114307


(San Francisco County


Super. Ct. No. CPF-03-502823)



I. INTRODUCTION


Richard Dye (Dye) filed a notice of appeal from a judgment denying his petition for writ of administrative mandamus pursuant to which he sought to vacate an order revoking his medical license. Because the superior court judgment is reviewable only pursuant to a petition for extraordinary writ (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2337), we dismiss this appeal.


II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY


On May 5, 2003, the Division of Medical Quality Medical Board of California (the Medical Board) issued a decision revoking Dye's physician and surgeon's certificate.


On September 19, 2005, Dye filed a â€





Description A decision regarding writ of administrative mandamus to vacate an order revoking medical license.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale