E-Med, Inc. v. Mainstreet Architects & Planners
Filed 6/19/07 E-Med, Inc. v. Mainstreet Architects & Planners CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
E-MED, INC., et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MAINSTREET ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, INC., et al. Defendants and Respondents. | 2d Civil No. B183791 (Super. Ct. No. CIV 220034) (Ventura County) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 29, 2007, be modified as follows:
On page 2, following the reference to footnote number 2, please add the following sentence:
"Alternatively, Karasiuk asks for a new trial."
There is no change in judgment.
Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line attorney.
