legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Edelist v. First USA Bank

Edelist v. First USA Bank
06:13:2006

Edelist v. First USA Bank




Filed 6/8/06 Edelist v. First USA Bank CA4/3




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE










DANIEL EDELIST, et al.,


Plaintiffs and Respondents,


v.


FIRST USA BANK, N.A. et al.,


Defendants and Respondents;


ROSIE M. ROSS,


Objector and Appellant.



G035215


(Super. Ct. No. 02CC00294)


O P I N I O N



Appeal from orders of the Superior Court of Orange County, Jonathan H. Cannon, Judge. Affirmed.


Kendrick & Nutley, J. Garrett Kendrick, and C. Benjamin Nutley for Objector and Appellant.


Morrison & Foerster, Robert S. Stern, Dean J. Zipser, and Marilyn D. Martin-Culver for Defendants and Respondents.


Strange & Carpenter, Brian R. Strange, Gretchen Carpenter, Law Offices of Barry L. Kramer and Barry L. Kramer for Plaintiff and Respondent.


* * *


Rosie Ross, an absent class member, filed objections to the proposed settlement of this class action suit and the request for attorney fees. The trial court approved the settlement and awarded attorney fees in the amount of $2,245,250. Ross appeals both orders; we affirm.


FACTS


Daniel Edelist filed this class action complaint on behalf of himself and all credit card holders with First USA Bank â€





Description A decision regarding objections to the proposed settlement of the class action suit and the request for attorney fees.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale