legal news


Register | Forgot Password

ENNABE v MANOSA

ENNABE v MANOSA
02:26:2011

ENNABE v MANOSA







ENNABE v MANOSA








Filed 12/20/10



CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE


FAIEZ ENNABE, Individually and as Administrator, etc., et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

CARLOS MANOSA et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

B222784

(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. KC053945)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]



THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed on December 1, 2010, be modified as follows:
On page 3, the fourth and fifth sentences of the second paragraph of the Background section are deleted and replaced with the following sentence:
Earlier in the day, Manosa provided money to purchase beer, tequila, and rum.
Appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied.
There is no change in the judgment.

MALLANO, P. J. CHANEY, J. JOHNSON, J.


Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale