E.R. v. Sup.
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
E.R., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Respondent; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Real Party in Interest. | E041773 (Super.Ct.Nos. J209749, J209750, & J210288*) OPINION |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ. Gary L. Vincent and Deborah A. Daniel, Temporary Judges.†Petition denied.
Monica Cazares for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Ruth E. Stringer, Acting County Counsel, and Jacqueline Carey-Wilson, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest.
Petitioner E.R. (mother) filed a petition for extraordinary writ pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 38.1(a),[1] regarding her children, M., D., and C. (the children). Mother contends that: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's findings that M. and D. came within Welfare and Institutions Code[2] section 300, subdivision (e); 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the court's finding that C. came within section 300, subdivision (j); and 3) the court erred in denying her reunification services under section 361.5, subdivision (b). We deny mother's writ petition.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On