Etazad v. Sdrales
Filed 3/22/06 Etazad v. Sdrales CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| BIJAN ETAZAD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LORRAINE SDRALES, Defendant and Respondent. | B181472 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC307214) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rolf M. Treu, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Office of Frank J. Lizarraga, Jr. and Frank J. Lizarraga, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Moore, Winter, Skebba & McLennan, Raymond R. Moore and Arthur E. Zitsow for Defendant and Respondent.
_________________________________
This medical malpractice action was resolved by summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal, claiming their request for a continuance should have been granted. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
FACTS
A.
On November 21, 2002, Ali Etazad was scheduled for hip surgery. Lorraine Sdrales, M.D., an anesthesiologist, attempted an â€
