Fabbri v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services
Filed 7/19/06 Fabbri v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
ANTHONY FABBRI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TD WATERHOUSE INVESTOR SERVICES, INC., Defendant and Respondent. | B187168 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS098231) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, George H. Wu, Judge. Affirmed.
Anthony Fabbri, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald, Michael J. Abbott, John L. Erikson, Jr., Brian G. Mulherin and Jill M. Buresh, for Respondent.
__________________________________
Anthony Fabbri appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court denied his petition to vacate an arbitration award and granted the petition of TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc. (Waterhouse) to confirm the arbitration award. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Fabbri had a securities account with Waterhouse that permitted margin trading. When Fabbri opened the account he signed an account application, which included an agreement to arbitrate any disputes: â€