Farhangi v. Bazargan
Filed 8/28/06 Farhangi v. Bazargan CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| GHAZAAL FARHANGI, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HOMAYOUN BAZARGAN, Defendant and Appellant. | G035997 (Super. Ct. No. 05NL20001) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Christopher J. Evans, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Homayoun Bazargan, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.
Ghazaal Farhangi, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
Defendant Homayoun Bazargan appeals from a civil restraining order to stop harassment obtained by plaintiff Ghazaal Farhangi pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. He challenges a recording evidencing violation of the statute, which plaintiff submitted at the hearing, on several grounds: it was illegally obtained, its admission violated his due process rights, it was a surprise, it was not authenticated, and it was inaudible. He also contends the evidence showed only one incident of harassment, which is insufficient to justify the order. The claims are without merit and we affirm.
FACTS
In July 2005 plaintiff filed a request to obtain an order to prevent civil harassment by defendant. She claimed she had been subjected to a â€
