legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Fields v. Maestro's Ristorante

Fields v. Maestro's Ristorante
06:13:2006

Fields v. Maestro's Ristorante










Filed 5/31/06 Fields v. Maestro's Ristorante CA1/3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS









California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.









IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION THREE










REBECCA FIELDS, et al.,


Plaintiffs and Respondents,


v.


MAESTRO'S RISTORANTE OF SAN RAMON, INC., et al.,


Defendants and Appellants.



A109130


(Contra Costa County


Super. Ct. No. C97-05176)



On a previous appeal by appellants Maestro's Ristorante of San Ramon, Inc. (Maestro's), Grace Young and Walter Young, we affirmed a judgment in favor of respondents Rebecca Fields and Rick Fields. (Fields v. Maestro's Ristorante of San Ramon, Inc. (May 20, 2005, A102857) [unpub. opn.] (Fields).) Appellants now appeal from two postjudgment orders, challenging an award to respondents of approximately $1.1 million in attorney fees incurred in the underlying litigation, with interest on the fee award from October 16, 2003. We affirm the orders.[1]


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND[2]


Respondent Rick Fields, together with his wife respondent Rebecca Fields, operated a comedy club in San Ramon known as â€





Description A decision regarding fraud, failure of consideration, and breach of contract.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale