Finley v. Steele
sFiled 9/6/06 Finley v. Steele CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| JOWELL FINLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. N. STEELE et al., Defendants and Respondents. |
F048528
(Super. Ct. No. 04CECG01208)
OPINION |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Donald S. Black, Judge.
Jowell Finley, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, James M. Humes, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Frances T. Grunder, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer A. Neill and David A. Carrasco, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.
-ooOoo-
Plaintiff is a prison inmate who sued a correctional officer and a correctional lieutenant claiming (1) they transferred him to a different building within the prison in retaliation for filing a grievance against the correctional officer, (2) the transfer was done with a negligent disregard for his health and safety because an enemy inmate was housed in the building to which he was transferred, and (3) they lost items of his personal property during the transfer. The defendants moved for summary judgment and the superior court granted the motion.
Plaintiff appeals claiming that (1) his â€
