Fujitsu Software v. Hinman
Filed 7/19/07 Fujitsu Software v. Hinman CA1/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
FUJITSU SOFTWARE CORP., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HOWARD E. HINMAN, Defendant and Appellant. | A115298 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 505639)
|
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 26, 2007, be modified as follows:
1. On page 17, the first sentence of the second full paragraph, beginning The 146,589.23 awarded is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place:
The $146,589.23 awarded in the trial courts attorney fees order of August 7, 2006, was the amount FSW incurred in the state court proceedingsessentially the attorney fees incurred in obtaining confirmation of the arbitration awards, as opposed to the fees incurred in the arbitration proceedings themselves.
There is no change in the judgment.
Dated:_____________________ ______________________________
JONES, P.J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line Lawyers.
