Garcia v. Reimonenq
Filed 7/20/06 Garcia v. Reimonenq CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| JOSE GARCIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL REIMONENQ, Defendant and Appellant. | B185430 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KC044394) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Dan Thomas Oki, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Offices of Gabriel Castellanos and Gabriel Castellanos for Defendant and Appellant.
The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_______________________________________
Appellant, Michael Reimonenq, appeals from a judgment of quite title and declaratory relief in favor of respondent Jose Garcia after a court trial without a jury. We affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
We are hampered in our review by the failure of appellant to include various documents in the clerk's transcript. The clerk's transcript contains only the following: â€
