Ghanizadeh v. Moghtader
Filed 8/21/06 Ghanizadeh v. Moghtader CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| MINA GHANIZADEH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MICHAEL H. MOGHTADER et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B187045 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC313379) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Jr., Judge. Affirmed.
Victoria L. Richardson, Larry Rothman & Associates and Larry Rothman for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Nemecek & Cole, Jonathan B. Cole, David B. Owen, and Mark Schaeffer for Defendants and Respondents Michael Moghtader and the Law Offices of Michael Moghtader.
Appellant Mina Ghanizadeh appeals from the trial court's denial of her postjudgment claim for attorney fees. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant retained respondent Michael Moghtader to perform certain legal services. When he failed to perform, appellant sued for breach of contract, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and legal malpractice. The causes of action for breach of contract and legal malpractice proceeded to jury trial. The jury found in favor of appellant on the breach of contract action and awarded $2,000 in damages, and in favor of respondent on the legal malpractice claim.
As to the breach of contract cause of action, appellant's operative complaint alleged, â€
