Gumrikyan v. Kesheshyan
Filed 6/27/06 Gumrikyan v. Kesheshyan CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| SARKIS GUMRIKYAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KHACHIK KESHESHYAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B189588 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. EC036378) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Charles W. Stoll, Judge. Dismissed.
Law Offices of David Drexler and David Drexler for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Michael P. Rubin & Associates and Michael P. Rubin for Defendants and Respondents.
Sarkis Gumrikyan, etc. (plaintiffs), are attempting to appeal an order entered by the trial court directing the receiver to sell a business and its real property together with all furnishings, personal property, licenses and other related assets. In a petition for writ of supersedeas, ancillary to the appeal, plaintiffs seek to stay the order to sell the business and its assets.
The threshold question is whether an order directing the sale of partnership assets under the direction of a receiver with final approval of the trial court required is interlocutory and therefore must be dismissed under the â€
