HABERBUSH v. CHARLES AND DOROTHY CUMMINS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Filed 5/31/06
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
DAVID R. HABERBUSH, as Assignee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHARLES AND DOROTHY CUMMINS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant and Appellant, | B175947 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NC032874) |
Story Continue from Part I ………………..
F. The post-judgment motions.
On April 8, 2004, Vantiger and Gemmel filed motions to set aside the judgment, asserting Haberbush had failed to prove his case.[1] Haberbush filed oppositions in both cases. On April 29, 2004, counsel appeared before Judge DiLoreto, who denied both motions. The court stated:
â€
