legal news


Register | Forgot Password

HAMILTON v. STATE

HAMILTON v. STATE
03:26:2006

HAMILTON v. STATE





FILED: March 22, 2006



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON



In the Matter of Anthony Hamilton, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.


STATE OF OREGON,


Respondent,


v.


ANTHONY J. HAMILTON,


Appellant.


0502-61739; A127893


Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.


Julia Philbrook, Judge.


Submitted on record and briefs February 3, 2006.


Liza Jane Langford filed the brief for appellant.


Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Seann C. Colgan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.


PER CURIAM


Reversed.


PER CURIAM


Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is dangerous to others. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is dangerous to others. We find the state's concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.


Reversed.


Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.


Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Apartment Manager Attorneys.





Description A decision regarding mental commitment case.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale