Hayes v. Security National Ins.
Hayes v. Security National Ins.
02:10:2006
Hayes v. Security National Ins.
Filed 2/2/06 Hayes v. Security National Ins. CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JANET GRAY HAYES, H027754
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Clara County
Superior Court
v. No. 1-00-CV792828)
SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant and Respondent.
_____________________________________/
Plaintiff Janet Gray Hayes filed an action against defendant Security National Insurance Company after she obtained a $1,000,000 libel and invasion of privacy judgment against defendant's insured, JL International Publishing Inc. (JL). Plaintiff and defendant filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion was granted, and defendant's motion, which was based solely on a â€
02:10:2006
Filed 2/2/06 Hayes v. Security National Ins. CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JANET GRAY HAYES, H027754
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Clara County
Superior Court
v. No. 1-00-CV792828)
SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant and Respondent.
_____________________________________/
Plaintiff Janet Gray Hayes filed an action against defendant Security National Insurance Company after she obtained a $1,000,000 libel and invasion of privacy judgment against defendant's insured, JL International Publishing Inc. (JL). Plaintiff and defendant filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion was granted, and defendant's motion, which was based solely on a â€
Description | A civil law decision on libel. |
Rating |