Hinchman v. Hinchman
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DONALD HINCHMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B191054 ( Super. |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Susan Bryant Deason, Judge. Affirmed.
Regan♦ Braun Law Offices, James J. Regan and Gene A. Wilker for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Artiano, Guzman & Toomey, James Artiano and Robert Yap for Defendants and Respondents.
__________________________
INTRODUCTION
This appeal is from a dismissal of the action filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court following the sustaining of a demurrer to plaintiffs' first amended complaint without leave to amend. The dispute giving rise to the Superior Court action involves eight siblings and their alleged respective rights to share pro rata in the proceeds of sale of real estate formerly owned by their deceased father and mother. For the reasons hereafter stated we affirm the judgment dismissing the action.
FACTUAL
The real property.
The realty which gives rise to the dispute among the siblings is located in Riverbank,