HOLMES v. PETROVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC,
Filed 1/13/11
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| GINA M. HOLMES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PETROVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants and Respondents. | C059133 (Super. Ct. No. 05AS04356) |
STORY CONTINUE FROM PART I….
B
Next, Holmes contends the court erred in granting the motion for summary adjudication on her cause of action for constructive discharge. According to Holmes, she â€
| Description | Plaintiff Gina Holmes appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendants Petrovich Development Company, LLC and Paul Petrovich in her lawsuit for sexual harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, violation of the right to privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.[1] She contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary adjudication with respect to the causes of action for discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination, and that the jury's verdict as to the remaining causes of action must be reversed due to evidentiary and instructional errors. We disagree and shall affirm the judgment. |
| Rating |
