legal news


Register | Forgot Password

HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.v. SUPERIOR COURT OF

HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.v. SUPERIOR COURT OF
02:21:2011

HOME DEPOT U

HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.v. SUPERIOR COURT OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY









Filed 1/10/11





CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

Respondent;

DEVON HARRIS et al.,

Real Parties In Interest.

B223184
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BC415774)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]





THE COURT:*
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 22, 2010 be modified as follows:
On page 8, line 4, delete the section title following “1.” and substitute: Violations of the Seating Requirement Contravene Section 1198
On page 12, line 18, delete the two sentences following the sentence ending with “Home Depot’s contention” and substitute the following sentence:
The seating requirement of Wage Order 7-2001, though framed as an affirmative standard of reasonable conduct, clearly prohibits employers from failing to provide suitable seating to employees under the conditions specified in the wage order.
The petition for rehearing by Petitioner Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. is denied. The modification does not change the judgment.






Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com









_________________________________________________________________
*WILLHITE, Acting P. J., MANELLA, J., SUZUKAWA, J.




Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale