Hong v. Superior Court
Filed 5/17/06 Hong v. Superior Court CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
YONG BAE HONG, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest. | G035931 (Super. Ct. No. 00NF2372) O P I N I O N |
Original proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Francisco Briseno, Judge. Petition denied.
David P. Elder for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Tony Rackauckas, District Attorney, and Jerry R. Schaffer, Deputy District Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.
THE COURT:
Yong Hong contends the court erred when it denied his discovery motion to obtain information which forms the basis of his affirmative defense. Based on the prosecution's representation that they have provided Hong with all materials in the archives of the Fullerton Police Department pertaining to â€
