In re A.G.
Filed 8/10/06 In re A.G. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re A.G. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CAROLINE G. et al., Defendants and Appellants. | E039579 (Super.Ct.No. J109181) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Robert M. Padia, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Linda Rehm, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Caroline G.
Patti L. Dikes, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jerry G.
Joe S. Rank, County Counsel, and Carole A. Nunes Fong, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Konrad S. Lee, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.
Defendants and Appellants Caroline G. (Mother) and Jerry G. (Father) are the parents of eight-year-old A.G. and 19-month old I.G.[1] The parents appeal from an order terminating their parental rights as to I.G. and establishing long-term guardianship as the permanent plan for A.G. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)[2] On appeal, Mother and Father contend (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying their request for a continuance to file a section 388 petition; (2) the juvenile court erred when it failed to apply the â€
