In re Albert F
Filed 6/20/06 In re Albert F. CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| In re ALBERT J. F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B186642 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VJ30796) |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALBERT J. F., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steff Padilla, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Dismissed.
California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director, and Dee A. Hayashi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Albert F., a minor, appeals after a juvenile court found true that he possessed a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a). On September 28, 2005, the court ordered entry of judgment deferred pending the minor's completion of the terms and conditions of probation pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code,[1] section 790. On October 17, 2005, the minor filed a notice of appeal from the juvenile court's September 28, 2005 orders. We appointed counsel to represent the minor. Appointed appellate counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284.)
In the opening brief, appointed appellate counsel conceded the appeal must be dismissed as it is governed by section 800, subdivision (a) which provides in part, â€
