Fear Not Law Articles: In re Alex D.

In re Alex D.

Filed 8/16/06 In re Alex D. CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

In re ALEX D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

B179067

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. JJ 12017)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

ALEX D.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. H. Kirkland Jones, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.

Mary Bernstein, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Marc E. Turchin and Analee J. Brodie, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________________

Minor Alex D. appeals from the order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section[1] 602. Alex contends the court failed to make a section 241.1 determination as to whether he should be a ward of the court or a dependent of the court, failed to make proper findings regarding his educational needs, and failed to exercise its discretion in setting his maximum confinement time. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SYNOPSIS

An amended petition filed pursuant to section 602 alleged in count 1 that Alex came within that section by committing murder and personally and intentionally discharging a shotgun, causing great bodily injury and death. Count 2 alleged Alex committed involuntary manslaughter, with personal use of a shotgun. Alex admitted the involuntary manslaughter and associated firearm use allegations. The other allegations were dismissed.

The juvenile court declared Alex a ward of the court and ordered Alex committed to the California Youth Authority (â€

Description	Appeal from the order declaring appellant a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. Appellant contends the court failed to make a section 241.1 determination as to whether appellant should be a ward of the court or a dependent of the court, failed to make proper findings regarding his educational needs, and failed to exercise its discretion in setting his maximum confinement time. Court affirm.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.