In re Alex M.
Filed 4/6/06 In re Alex M. CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin)
----
| In re ALEX M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALEX M., Defendant and Appellant. |
C048060
(Super. Ct. No. J61390)
|
Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court sustained a charge of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) against Alex M., a 16-year-old minor. The minor was placed on probation and ordered, among other things, to pay $2,380 in restitution to the victim, a 2 percent restitution collection fee, and a $20 court security fee.
On appeal, the minor contends that neither the 2 percent collection fee nor the $20 court security fee are authorized. The People claim the 2 percent restitution collection fee was properly imposed as a condition of probation, but agree that the security fee must be stricken. We conclude that neither fee was authorized and shall order both stricken.
DISCUSSION
I
The juvenile court ordered the minor to pay restitution of $2,380 plus â€
