legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Andre T.

In re Andre T.
02:28:2007

In re Andre T


In re Andre T.


Filed 2/7/07  In re Andre T. CA4/2


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


 


FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


 


DIVISION TWO










In re ANDRE T., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


TAMARRA T.,


            Defendant and Appellant.



            E041371


            (Super.Ct.No. J202590)


            OPINION



            APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County.  Deborah A. Daniel, Temporary Judge.  (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.)  Affirmed.


            Neil R. Trop, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Ruth E. Stringer, Acting County Counsel, and Phebe W. Chu, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Ellen L. Bacon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.


Tamarra T. (mother) challenges the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights to her son, Andre, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 366.26.  Her only contention is that the San Bernardino County Department of Children's Services (DCS) failed to comply with the notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), requiring reversal.  We find that DCS substantially complied with the notice requirements and therefore reject mother's claim.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


Andre was born in June 2005, one month after mother was released from prison.  When he tested positive for methamphetamine, mother was offered a voluntary plan of family maintenance.  Within a few weeks, before she had a chance to participate in any services, mother was arrested for violating the terms of her probation, and was again incarcerated.  Andre was placed in foster care, and a juvenile dependency petition was filed.  The whereabouts of Andre's father, Charles F., were then unknown. 


Shortly thereafter, mother advised the social worker that Andre's maternal grandfather, Robert Tanner, may be â€





Description Mother challenges the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights to her son, Andre, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Codesection 366.26. Her only contention is that the San Bernardino County Department of Children's Services (DCS) failed to comply with the notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), requiring reversal. Court find that DCS substantially complied with the notice requirements and therefore reject mother's claim.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale