legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Angelo P.

In re Angelo P.
08:15:2006

In re Angelo P.



Filed 8/14/06 In re Angelo P. CA1/1







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE














In re ANGELO P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.




THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


ANGELO P.,


Defendant and Appellant.



A113303


(Alameda County


Super. Ct. No. J-177646)



Angelo P., a minor, appeals from an order of the juvenile court continuing him as a ward of the court and returning him to the custody of the California Youth Authority (CYA). Appellate counsel asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine if it discloses the presence of any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We have concluded that review and, finding neither error nor arguable issues, affirm.


Angelo P., born in January 1988, was adjudged a ward of the court on October 1, 1999, following an admission that he committed a misdemeanor battery. (Pen. Code § 243.2, subd. (a).) On September 28, 2001, an amended petition was filed alleging that he committed a robbery (Pen. Code §211) and personally used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense. (Pen. Code § 12022, subd. (b)(1).) Appellant admitted the robbery allegation and the weapon allegation was dismissed. A â€





Description A minor appeals from an order of the juvenile court continuing him as a ward of the court and returning appellant to the custody of the California Youth Authority (CYA). Appellate counsel asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine if it discloses the presence of any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Court have concluded that review and, finding neither error nor arguable issues, affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale