In re Anthony
Filed 2/24/06 In re Anthony E. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re ANTHONY E., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SHERRY E., Defendant and Appellant. | E038129 (Super.Ct.No. J-191884) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Raymond L. Haight, III, Judge. Affirmed.
Rich Pfeiffer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Wanda H.
Konrad S. Lee, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Sherry E.
Ronald D. Reitz, County Counsel, and Jacqueline Carey-Wilson, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Sharon S. Rollo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.
In this consolidated appeal, Sherry E. (mother) and her mother, Wanda H. (grandmother), appeal various juvenile court orders. Mother appeals from judgment entered following termination of her parental rights to her son, Anthony. Mother contends she was not provided reasonable reunification services. She also complains that the juvenile court erred in failing to invoke the â€
