legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re ANTHONY C. ( Part I )

In re ANTHONY C. ( Part I )
05:17:2006

In re ANTHONY C.




Filed 4/28/06 (opn. on rehearing)







CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT





(Sacramento)













In re ANTHONY C., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


______________________________________


THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


ANTHONY C.,


Defendant and Appellant.



C048529



(Super. Ct. No. JV110110)



OPINION ON REHEARING




APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Peter Mering, Judge. (Retired Judge of the Sac. Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal Const.) Reversed.


Heather J. MacKay, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Julie A. Hokans, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Raymond L. Brosterhous II, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Anthony C. (hereafter Anthony) appeals from the judgment of extended commitment to the California Youth Authority (CYA)[1] pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 1800 et seq.[2] That scheme allows for a two-year extension of a CYA commitment if a jury finds that upon discharge, the ward â€





Description A judgment of extended commitment to the California Youth Authority (CYA)[1] pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 1800 et seq.[2] That scheme allows for a two-year extension of a CYA commitment if a jury finds that upon discharge, the ward â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale